disappointment/acceptance of the lacunae between people and their developed ideas in writing. not as lived-ideas (doing as they write), but as lived intellect (chewing over what they write).
people don’t like to talk about what they write. differences in mind-state? references-at-hand?
back to pragmatism in academic practice: are discourse and action the point of writing?
- cultural fodder – “have you read…”
- frameworks for thought – “write it down, it will help you make it / talk about it…”
- concept – realization
- theory – practice
- technological rhetoric – technological implementation