Annual Conference of the Society for European Philosophy and the Forum for European Philosophy in conjunction with York St John University
Earth Sky Gods and Mortals
Actants / Actors / Monad / Substance – Morton / Leibnitz / Harman
Neither physical objects not human subjects only (radical toolism between human and world)
We cannot think human without world or world without humans
Subject are a special form of objects – OOO is not a materialism
What objects are
- Aristotle as a figure of the cutting edge
- Hussrl’s intentional objects
- the intentional object does not hide, they are encrusted with extraneous detail
- Heidegger
- Tool-beings – Any change in the world from one state to another
- Withdrawn from consciousness –
- Two philosophies of entities as complete things…
- Undermining and overmining of objects – too shallow or too deep
Each of these has numerous sub-variants
Two ways
- Finding a fundamental – making things smaller
- Mainstream materialism – basic mathematical
- Apaeron – treating the universe as a single whole from which all things
Part and pieces of a body can be changed without changing the body…
Overmining of objects is…
- subjectivism / idealism
- cannot explain why anything would ever change – there must be an excess to the things that are hidden
- Meillasoux – absolute contingency – too high a price to pay…
Critique of Materialism – Undermining
- “Believing in bananas and cities is just a surface effect”
- Breaking things down to quarks and atomsss
- Dogmatic set of traits that undermines materialism in the first place…
- Pre-socratics – amateur boxers, slaves in a household – they are obsessed with the obsession with material gloss
Latour / Whitehead – are overminers – too concrete . cinematic
Bergson / Deleuze – underminers – deny the ontology of the object itself
not reducible downward to constitutents – not reducible upward to their apparences to us
Aristotle – the individual thing reaaserting itself
- Badiou on Deleuze – the return of the question of being is the most contemporary problem in philosophy
- Heidegger asks the question of being in a
- Truth and Method – “What being is should be determiend … Heidegger’s thesis was that being itself was time…” – Goddamer’s realist conception of Heidegger
Time for Heidegger
- Sheer presence undercut for threefold structure
- Bergson’s movement
- Vertical reasons – instants are more than what they seem to be…
- Tool Analysis – 1919 (Being and Time)
- Tool Being – radicalising phenomenology
- Dewey having already
- Lavoisier – relations with objects (oxygen / hydrogen / chair )
- Temporality for Heidegger – things cannot be thought outside of their use (realism)
- It is not humans that cause objects to withdraw…
- Medieval islamic philosophy – fire burning cotton
- Being and relation – being is that which exists in excess
Husslr and Heidegger – for Husserl everything is overdetermined… for Heidegger everything withdraws into the dark void
Islamic philosphy – occasionalism – nothing interacts, only God interacts with them
- The problem with occasionalism is not that God is at the top – but that any one entity is specifically involved
- Asharites – A Farabi -
- Artistotles – autonomy of individual substances - A.’s prime mover is not one who accounts of every act / event in the world, but one of an originary movement
Aporea – if a thing is one than how can a thing have parts…
Aristotle’s attack on the Metagarians – Chapter 3
Saul Cripkey
Reductionism of “Objects” – trees are objects but
Manuel Delanda’s definition of objects – Philosophy of Society – redundant philosophy
Chicago is no less a real thing than the blades of grass on the Cubs’ field (“The Chicago Cubs cannot be overmined or undermined”)
For Aristotle – Time Magnitude and Motion as continuous – Substance as discontinuous
Aristotles non-individual forms was his fear of infinite regress
Violence (ethics?) and naturalism – what is the difference between splitting a bag of balls down the middle and a splitting a duck down the middle
Bertano – immanent objectivity – precursor
What Heidegger is actually talking about with time is space – “Being and Space” – space and time is the tension between the relation and the representation
Distinction between intentional and real objects
- Intentional can be aggregate
- Real objects are all aggregate
- Not all aggregates are real objects
Aristotle’s four causes – vicarious causation – two things cannot effect
Latour – Pandora’s Hope – politics and neutrons – Latour Jolieux – Latour’s problem of infinite regress…
Respect for modern physics
- Quarks, etc. – it they are objects
Everything Must Go – scientific reductionism – all these crazy ways of getting around autonomous objects
Aristotle is very c
Stephen – Occasionalism – Islamic – Mallabranche
How two things can effect each other – if they are indefinable
Pan-psycheism – everything gets a mind that has subject / object relations. Correlationism of a form where humans are not at the top or bottom of a hierarchy would be ok. Meiilasoux is too Hegelian… as are Badiou and Zizek.
Deriving an ethics / politics from ontology, e.g.: Badiou – theory of value from ontologies are often too hasty… People like Badiou’s politics but they may seem arbitrary / loose from his ontology.